Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The development of architecture and settlement is central to discussions concerning the Neolithic transformation as the very visible evidence for the changes in society that run parallel to the domestication of plants and animals. Architecture has been used as an important aspect of models of how the transformation occurred, and as evidence for the sharp difference between huntergatherer and farming societies. We suggest that the emerging evidence for considerable architectural complexity from the early Neolithic indicates that some of our interpretations depend too much on a very basic understanding of structures which are normally seen as being primarily for residential purposes and containing households, which become the organising principle for the new communities which are often seen as fully sedentary and described as villages. Recent work in southern Jordan suggests that in this region at least there is little evidence for a standard house, and that structures are constructed for a range of diverse primary purposes other than simple domestic shelters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finlayson et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: