⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

December 1, 2003Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

Contemporary ‘vehicularity’ and ‘romanticism’: debating the status of ideas and intellectuals

Gregor McLennan Thomas Osborne

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This essay considers the changing nature of ideas work and the role of intellectuals in contemporary informational capitalism, or, to use that ubiquitous phrase, ‘knowledge society’. It is worth re...

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

McLennan et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11d95026b419a984b4d0ae https://doi.org/10.1080/1369823042000241267

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Unequal language recognition reconsidered: voluntary migration, expectation interest, and recent challengesCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · Mon,
2Constitutional patriotism and its social carriers: a functional ecology of democratic membershipCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · Fri,
3Structural injustice and disability: a relational egalitarian accountCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · Tue,
4Is decentralization democratic?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · Fri,
5Majoritarian democracy without the discursive dilemmaCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy · Tue,

More from Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy

The case for electoral anonymityTue,
Non-domination at work: two puzzles for liberal relational egalitariansThu,
Expressivism and liberal relational equality: reply to criticsTue,
Equality and Social Relations – Introduction to the Book Symposium on Christian Schemmel’s Justice and Egalitarian Relations (Oxford University Press, 2021)Wed,
Expressionist relational egalitarianism: Schemmel’s core argumentThu,