Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article replies to criticisms of expressivism and relational egalitarianism, suggesting broader implications for justice.
This article replies to the objections and challenges raised in the comments on Justice and Egalitarian Relations in this symposium. It focuses on some key arguments of the book – for expressivism about justice, and for a specifically justice-based liberal conception of relational egalitarianism – and examines how its approach can be extended further, to speak to issues of global justice, care and domination at work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian Schemmel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: