Key result
Cardiovascular surgery litigation review highlights the need for risk prevention, value-based governance, and guideline adherence.
Why the study?
Malpractice in cardiovascular surgery was addressed from a forensic pathology perspective to offer reflections on risk prevention in the Italian context.
This narrative review highlights the critical role of integrated risk management, informed consent, and team-based decision-making in mitigating malpractice litigation in Italian cardiovascular surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide risk mitigation in cardiovascular surgery; leaves open generalizability and prospective validation of litigation reduction.
Background/Objectives: Malpractice in cardiovascular surgery was addressed from the forensic pathology perspective, offering reflections on risk prevention in the Italian context. Litigation and risk management in healthcare, following the Italian law on safety of care, clinical risk management and professional liability, should be viewed in an integrated manner. Methods: We conducted a narrative review on litigation data and the principal areas of complaint in Italy regarding the cardiovascular field. The aim is to discuss human, communicative, organisational, technological and regulatory factors that may play a role in this phenomenon. Results: We discuss the importance of information and consent and the management and monitoring of competences, particularly in specialised activities, given the current human capital deficit. Furthermore, we focus on the centrality of the surgical indication focusing on benefit-risk balance in light of clinical guidelines and team-based evaluation, such as by an emergency heart team, to better tailor care to patients. At the facility level, the minimum volume of activity and the requirements for human resources, specialisations, technologies and organisation standards needed for health activity authorisation are highlighted as foundational to risk prevention. Furthermore, we discussed the availability of the minimum diagnostic and care tools in compliance with guidelines and the role of company clinical and organisational protocols. Conclusions: In the surgical, time-sensitive, highly specialised and technologically advanced sector, the importance of enterprise risk prevention and broad, value-based governance to ensure healthcare quality and safety is emphasised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolcato et al. (2024) conducted a review in Malpractice in cardiovascular surgery. A narrative review of litigation in Italian cardiovascular surgery highlights the importance of enterprise risk prevention, value-based governance, and adherence to clinical guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: