Key result
Chronic rapid atrial pacing-induced atrial fibrillation caused a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in dogs from 54% to 33% (P<0.05), but did not cause significant ventricular dysfunction in goats.
Why the study?
Does chronic atrial fibrillation induced by rapid atrial pacing cause left ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis differently across animal models (dogs, goats, pigs)?
Does chronic atrial fibrillation induced by rapid atrial pacing cause left ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis differently across animal models (dogs, goats, pigs)?
Absolute Event Rate: 33% vs 54%
p-value: p=<0.05
The dog model of chronic AF develops heart failure and LV fibrosis, whereas the goat model develops only atrial fibrosis, demonstrating species-specific differences in AF-induced structural remodeling.
Species differences in AF-induced LV effects limit model translation to patients; leaves open optimal preclinical species for human-like remodeling.
Structural remodeling in chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs over weeks to months. To study the electrophysiological, structural, and functional changes that occur in chronic AF, the selection of the best animal model is critical. AF was induced by rapid atrial pacing (50-Hz stimulation every other second) in pigs (n = 4), dogs (n = 8), and goats (n = 9). Animals underwent MRIs at baseline and 6 mo to evaluate left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). Dogs were given metoprolol (50-100 mg po bid) and digoxin (0.0625-0.125 mg po bid) to limit the ventricular response rate to <180 beats/min and to mitigate the effects of heart failure. The pacing leads in pigs became entirely encapsulated and lost the ability to excite the heart, often before the onset of sustained AF. LV EF in dogs dropped from 54 ± 11% at baseline to 33 ± 7% at 6 mo (P < 0.05), whereas LV EF in goats did not drop significantly (69 ± 8% at baseline vs. 60 ± 9% at 6 mo, P = not significant). After 6 mo of AF, fibrosis levels in dog atria and ventricles increased, whereas only atrial fibrosis levels increased in goats compared with control animals. In our experience, the pig model is not appropriate for chronic rapid atrial pacing-induced AF studies. Rate-controlled chronic AF in the dog model developed HF and LV fibrosis, whereas the goat model developed only atrial fibrosis without ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis. Both the dog and goat models are representative of segments of the patient population with chronic AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dosdall et al. (2013) studied Chronic atrial fibrillation (n=31). Rapid atrial pacing (RAP) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) in dogs (p=<0.05). Chronic rapid atrial pacing-induced atrial fibrillation caused a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in dogs from 54% to 33% (P<0.05), but did not cause significant ventricular dysfunction in goats.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: