Key result
Planned systematic review compares opioid-free versus opioid-based anaesthesia for postsurgical pain scores.
Why the study?
Recent reviews have questioned the clinical benefits of opioid-free anaesthesia, and diverse adjuvant agents complicate evaluating their effectiveness and risks.
Does opioid-free anaesthesia improve postsurgical pain scores in adult surgical patients compared to opioid-based anaesthesia?
Systematic Review
Does opioid-free anaesthesia improve postsurgical pain scores in adult surgical patients compared to opioid-based anaesthesia?
This protocol outlines a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia components compared to opioid-based anesthesia in adult surgical patients.
Leaves open optimal postsurgical analgesia strategy; planned network meta-analysis may clarify opioid-free anaesthesia role for clinicians and researchers.
INTRODUCTION: The rise of opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) aims to reduce postoperative pain while reducing opioid-related side effects during surgery. However, the various adjuvant agents used in OFA complicate the evaluation of their effectiveness and risks. Recent reviews question the clinical benefits of OFA, highlighting the need for thorough evaluation. This protocol describes a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of OFA with opioid-based anaesthesia and will identify key components for optimal postoperative outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic search of literature published in English without time restriction in Embase, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and CINAHL, along with Google Scholar for grey literature. The final search will be performed on 1 October 2024. We will include randomised controlled trials with adult patients undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia, excluding preclinical, observational, regional anaesthesia-only and prolonged anaesthesia outside the operating room studies. The primary outcome is postsurgical pain scores, with secondary outcomes including quality of recovery, opioid consumption, adverse effects and long-term events. We will assess bias using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool and conduct Bayesian network meta-analyses for pooled estimates. We will report effect estimates as ORs and standardised mean differences with 95% credible intervals and assess certainty using GRADE methodology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international anaesthesia and pain management conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024505853.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belltall et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Adult surgical patients. Opioid-free anaesthesia vs. Opioid-based anaesthesia was evaluated on Postsurgical pain scores. This protocol describes a planned systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of opioid-free anaesthesia with opioid-based anaesthesia on postsurgical pain scores.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: