Key result
Among patients with perinodal focal atrial tachycardias, 25% required ablation in the noncoronary aortic cusp, with no clinical or electrophysiological clues predicting the true original site.
Why the study?
Do clinical and electrophysiological properties predict the need for noncoronary aortic cusp (NCC) ablation in patients with perinodal atrial tachycardias?
Population
113 patients with focal atrial tachycardias who underwent electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency…
Comparison
Radiofrequency catheter ablation in the… vs Radiofrequency catheter ablation from the…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
No predictors guide NCC ablation in perinodal AT; leaves open prospective studies to identify reliable markers.
Observational (n=113)
Do clinical and electrophysiological properties predict the need for noncoronary aortic cusp (NCC) ablation in patients with perinodal atrial tachycardias?
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 75%
Approximately 25% of perinodal atrial tachycardias require ablation in the noncoronary aortic cusp, but there are currently no reliable clinical or electrophysiological predictors to identify these cases prior to ablation.
Ju et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Perinodal atrial tachycardias (n=113). Noncoronary aortic cusp (NCC) ablation vs. Endocardial right atrium ablation was evaluated on Successful elimination of perinodal atrial tachycardia. Among patients with perinodal focal atrial tachycardias, 25% required ablation in the noncoronary aortic cusp, with no clinical or electrophysiological clues predicting the true original site.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: