A hybrid wavelet-median denoising method combined with a modified lightweight CNN improved ECG signal classification testing accuracy to 0.92 compared to 0.80 with noisy data.
A hybrid wavelet-median denoising method significantly improves the accuracy of CNN-based ECG signal classification compared to using noisy data.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.92% vs 0.8%
The classification of ECG signals is a critical process because it guides the diagnosis of the proper treatment process for the patient. However, any form of disturbance with ECG signals can be highly conspicuous because of the mechanics involved in data acquisition from living beings, which has a significant impact on the classification procedure. The purpose of this research work is to advance ECG signal classification results by employing numerous denoising methods and, in turn, boost the accuracy of cardiovascular diagnoses. To simulate realistic conditions, we added various types of noise to ECG data, including Gaussian, salt and pepper, speckle, uniform, and exponential noise. To overcome the interference of noise from environments in the obtained ECG signals, we employed wavelet transform, median filter, Gaussian filter, and the hybrid of the wavelet and median filters. The proposed hybrid denoising method has better results than the other methods because of the use of wavelet multi-scale analysis and the ability of the median filter to avoid the loss of vital ECG characteristics. Thus, despite a certain proximity in the values, the hybrid method is significantly more accurate and reliable, as evidenced by the mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared, and Pearson correlation coefficient. More specifically, the hybrid approach provided an MSE of 0.0012 and an MAE of 0.025, the R-squared value for this study was 0.98, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.99, which provides a very good resemblance to the original ECG confirmation. The proposed classification model is based on the modified lightweight CNN or MLCNN that was trained using the noisy and the denoised data. The findings demonstrated that by applying the denoised data, the testing accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores achieved 0.92, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.91 for the datasets, while the noisy data achieved 0.80, 0.78, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively. In this study, the signal quality and denoising methods were found to enhance ECG signal classification and diagnostic accuracy while encouraging proper preprocessing in future studies and applications for real-time ECG for cardiac care.
Pal et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in ECG signal classification. Hybrid wavelet-median denoising and modified lightweight CNN vs. Noisy data was evaluated on Testing accuracy. A hybrid wavelet-median denoising method combined with a modified lightweight CNN improved ECG signal classification testing accuracy to 0.92 compared to 0.80 with noisy data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: