Key result
3D-mapping guidance during PFA is linked to ~100% first-pass PVI success versus fluoroscopy alone.
Why the study?
Pulsed field ablation with a circular-electrode-array catheter is effective and safe, but data on procedural workflow are limited.
Does 3D-map guidance improve procedural efficiency and first-pass isolation rates compared to fluoroscopy alone during cPFA for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=35)
Open-label
No
Does 3D-map guidance improve procedural efficiency and first-pass isolation rates compared to fluoroscopy alone during cPFA for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 81%
p-value: p=0.0079
Visualization and 3D-mapping during circular-catheter pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation enables wide antral lesions and higher first-pass isolation rates with reduced fluoroscopy time compared to a fluoroscopy-only approach.
May support 3D-mapping integration to boost first-pass isolation in cPFA; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation.
Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) with a circular-electrode-array catheter (cPFA) has shown to be effective and safe. However, data on procedural workflow are limited. Objective: to analyze the process of streamlining cPFA-procedures including evaluation of fluoroscopy versus 3D-map guidance and lesion characteristics. Methods: Consecutive AF-patients underwent cPFA-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in three phases (learning-phase-I: visualization of cPFA in 3D-map; phase-II: operator blinded to 3D-map with fluoroscopy-guidance only; phase-III: optimized mapping and ablation). Additionally, hemolysis-parameters were collected. Results: A total of 35 patients (57 % paroxysmal-AF, age 63.4 ± 9.4 years) were enrolled: n = 10 phase-I, n = 15 phase-II, n = 10 in phase III. Total procedure and fluoroscopy time was 51.9 ± 9.4 and 6.7 ± 3.1 min, respectively. First-pass PFA isolation-rate was lowest in the fluoroscopy-only phase-II (I:86 %, II:81 %, III:100 %, p = 0.0079). Insufficient PV ablation with remaining conduction occurred mostly anterior (n = 8/15, 53 %) and at the carina (n = 4/15; 27 %). Following additional PFA, all 142 PVs (100 %) were acutely isolated.Procedure times between phase II and III did not differ (49 ± 8 vs. 46 ± 3 mins p = 0.23). Fluoroscopy times were longer in phase-II (phase-I: 5.8 ± 1.3, phase-II: 9.2 ± 2.9, phase-III: 3.8 ± 1.0 mins, p < 0.0001). No complications occurred. Pre- and post-ablation hemoglobin (14.4 ± 1.4 vs. 13.5 ± 1.2 g/dl, p = 0.0169) and LDH (188 ± 39 vs. 210 ± 29 U/l, p = 0.0007) were different. Conclusion: The cPFA-catheter allows for fast and efficient PVI. A fluoroscopy-only approach creates distal PV ablation lesions that are associated with residual PV conduction along the carina and anterior antrum. However, with visualization and mapping, creation of wide antral ablation lesions is feasible without prolonging procedural duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunawardene et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=35). Pulsed field ablation with circular-electrode-array catheter and 3D-mapping vs. Fluoroscopy-guided pulsed field ablation was evaluated on First-pass pulmonary vein isolation rate (p=0.0079). Optimized 3D-mapping guidance during pulsed field ablation with a circular-electrode-array catheter achieved a 100% first-pass pulmonary vein isolation rate compared to 81% with fluoroscopy alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: