Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONALE: Radiocarbon dating and stable isotope analyses of bone collagen, wool, hair and silk contaminated with extraneous carbon (e.g. humic substances) does not yield reliable results if these materials are pre-treated using conventional methods. METHODS: A cross-flow nanofiltration method was developed that can be applied to various protein materials like collagen, hair, silk, wool and leather, and should be able to remove low-molecular and high-molecular weight contaminants. To avoid extraneous carbon contamination via the filter a ceramic filter (molecular weight cut-off of 200 Da) was used. The amino acids, released by hot acid hydrolysis of the protein material, were collected in the permeate and contaminants in the retentate (>200 Da). RESULTS: (14)C-dating results for various contaminated archaeological samples were compared for bulk material (pre-treated with the conventional methods) and for cross-flow nanofiltrated amino acids (permeate) originating from the same samples. Contamination and quality control of (14)C dates of bulk and permeate samples were obtained by measuring C:N ratios, fluorescence spectra, and δ(13)C and δ(15)N values of the samples. Cross-flow nanofiltration decreases the C:N ratio which means that contaminants have been removed. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-flow nanofiltration clearly improved sample quality and (14)C results. It is a quick and non-labor-intensive technique and can easily be implemented in any (14)C and stable isotope laboratory for routine sample pre-treatment analyses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boudin et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: