Key result
OACs remain markedly underused in AF, reaching only ~10% of eligible non-valvular patients.
Why the study?
Atrial fibrillation carries an increased risk of thromboembolism, but information on the real-world application of risk-stratified antithrombotic treatment was needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=260)
No
Antithrombotic therapy is markedly underutilized in patients with atrial fibrillation in real-world clinical practice, highlighting a significant gap in stroke prevention.
Anticoagulation underuse in AF merits attention; leaves open whether interventions improve uptake in similar settings.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation is a common atrial tachyarrhythmia with an increased risk of thromboembolism. This study aims to provide information about the application of antithrombotic treatment based on risk stratification schemes for stroke in real-life clinical practices. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study in 260 patients admitted at the tertiary care hospital with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation from January 2019 to February 2020 after approval from the Institutional Review Committee (ref. no. 207/2018). Convenient sampling was used. Predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation, risk factors for stroke, and the use of antithrombotics were obtained based on the pre-structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20. RESULTS: The prevalence of valvular and non-valvular atrial fibrillation was 125 (48.0%), and 135 (51.9%) respectively. Among patients with a non-valvular variant, 102 (75.5%) had a CHA2DS2VASc-score of ≥2 who were eligible for oral anticoagulants, 13 (9.6 %) patients received it with a majority having sub-therapeutic international normalized ratio. Among patients with valvular type, only 47 (37.6%) patients were receiving oral anticoagulants and 20 (42.5%) patients achieved therapeutic international normalized ratio. Two hundred forty three (93.4%) patients had dilated left atrium (≥40mm), 119 (45.9%) had hypertension and 27 (10.3%) had diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotics were markedly underused in patients with atrial fibrillation. There is a need for proper application of risk stratification schemes for stroke and appropriate use of antithrombotics to prevent thromboembolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhungana et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=260). Antithrombotic treatment was evaluated on Prevalence of valvular and non-valvular atrial fibrillation and application of antithrombotic treatment. Antithrombotics were markedly underused in patients with atrial fibrillation, with only 9.6% of eligible non-valvular and 37.6% of valvular AF patients receiving oral anticoagulants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: