Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to express what is uniquely accomplished in the field, Asian studies should be reconceived as Asian humanities and should adhere to three principles: care first, learn from, and connect histories. A review of the history and criticisms of Asian studies as a field calls for a positive theoretical articulation of what the best scholarship in Asian studies does and has done. The principles advocated here are not exclusive to Asian studies and should be extended to all area studies fields, but they are offered as a way to understand Asian studies as an essential field of the university and the academy, unique because of its content but common in spirit with the humanities generally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald R. Davis (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: