Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines how citizenship operates in urban community-building programmes, particularly in the comprehensive community-building initiative (CCI) model. We argue that the current context shaping cities today gives rise to flexibility in citizenship and that this flexibility emerges as a key component by which resident and non-resident stakeholders position themselves to make claims to participate in CCIs. We posit that, while the CCI model is committed to being 'resident-driven', the operative function of citizenship creates a hindrance rather than an opportunity for local resident involvement. We fortify this thesis with a case study from our experience in CCIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lepofsky et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: