Key result
Bicuspid aortic valves show higher calcification volumes than tricuspid valves, with annular calcification predicting worse survival.
Why the study?
Mechanical strain drives aortic calcification, leading researchers to investigate whether calcification localizes to areas of highest strain and whether patterns differ between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.
Do calcification patterns differ between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=101)
Do calcification patterns differ between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
p-value: p=0.53
Bicuspid aortic valves have different calcification patterns with higher volumes compared to tricuspid valves, and high annular calcification is associated with impaired survival.
Annular calcification may identify higher-risk severe AS patients; hypothesis-generating for pattern-specific stratification and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Mechanical strain plays a major role in the development of aortic calcification. We hypothesized that (i) valvular calcifications are most pronounced at the localizations subjected to the highest mechanical strain and (ii) calcification patterns are different in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. METHODS: Multislice computed tomography scans of 101 patients with severe aortic stenosis were analysed using a 3-dimensional post-processing software to quantify calcification of tricuspid aortic valves (n = 51) and bicuspid aortic valves (n = 50) after matching. RESULTS: Bicuspid aortic valves exhibited higher calcification volumes and increased calcification of the non-coronary cusp with significantly higher calcification of the free leaflet edge. The non-coronary cusp showed the highest calcium load compared to the other leaflets. Patients with annular calcification above the median had an impaired survival compared to patients with low annular calcification, whereas patients with calcification of the free leaflet edge above the median did not (P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Calcification patterns are different in patients with aortic stenosis with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Patients with high annular calcification might have an impaired prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gollmann‐Tepeköylü et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=101). Bicuspid aortic valves vs. Tricuspid aortic valves was evaluated on Calcification volume and patterns (p=0.53). Bicuspid aortic valves exhibited higher calcification volumes than tricuspid valves, and high annular calcification impaired survival, unlike free leaflet edge calcification (P=0.53).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: