Key result
Endurance running at 70% maximum heart rate significantly enhanced positive emotional valence and arousal compared to walking in experienced endurance runners.
Why the study?
Does acute endurance running compared to walking improve emotional state and cognitive control in endurance runners?
RCT (n=36)
Open-label
Counterbalanced order
No
Does acute endurance running compared to walking improve emotional state and cognitive control in endurance runners?
Effect estimate: η2 0.025
p-value: p=0.027
Acute moderate-intensity endurance running improves emotional valence without impairing cognitive control in endurance athletes.
Suggests exercise intensity matters for acute mood effects in athletes; leaves open applicability to non-athletes and clinical settings.
Acute exercise consistently benefits both emotion and cognition, particularly cognitive control. We evaluated acute endurance exercise influences on emotion, domain-general cognitive control and the cognitive control of emotion, specifically cognitive reappraisal. Thirty-six endurance runners, defined as running at least 30 miles per week with one weekly run of at least 9 miles (21 female, age 18-30 years) participated. In a repeated measures design, participants walked at 57% age-adjusted maximum heart rate (HR max ; range 51%-63%) and ran at 70% HR max (range 64%-76%) for 90 min on two separate days. Participants completed measures of emotional state and the Stroop test of domain-general cognitive control before, every 30 min during and 30 min after exercise. Participants also completed a cognitive reappraisal task (CRT) after exercise. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) tracked changes in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin (O 2 Hb and dHb) levels in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Results suggest that even at relatively moderate intensities, endurance athletes benefit emotionally from running both during and after exercise and task-related PFC oxygenation reductions do not appear to hinder prefrontal-dependent cognitive control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giles et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Healthy endurance runners (n=36). Endurance running vs. Walking (57% HRmax) was evaluated on Emotional valence (Feeling Scale) (η2 0.025, p=0.027). Endurance running at 70% maximum heart rate significantly enhanced positive emotional valence and arousal compared to walking in experienced endurance runners.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: