Key result
The SHAM-PVI study is an ongoing double-blind randomized trial of 140 patients designed to compare pulmonary vein isolation to a sham procedure for reducing total atrial fibrillation burden at 6 months.
Why the study?
Previous studies showing pulmonary vein isolation reduces atrial fibrillation burden and symptoms were unblinded, raising the possibility of a placebo effect.
Does pulmonary vein isolation reduce total AF burden in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF compared to a sham procedure?
RCT (n=140)
Double-blind
randomized
Does pulmonary vein isolation reduce total AF burden in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF compared to a sham procedure?
This study design paper outlines a double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the true efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation on AF burden, accounting for potential placebo effects.
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has been shown to reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) burden and symptoms in patients. However, to date previous studies have been unblinded raising the possibility of a placebo effect to account for differences in outcomes. HYPOTHESIS & METHODS: The objective of this study is to compare PV isolation to a sham procedure in patients with symptomatic AF. The SHAM-PVI study is a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial. 140 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF will be randomized to either PV isolation (with cryoballoon ablation) or a sham procedure (with phrenic nerve pacing). All patients will receive an implantable loop recorder. The primary outcome is total AF burden at 6 months postrandomisation (excluding the 3 month blanking period). Key secondary outcomes include (1) time to symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (2) total atrial tachyarrhythmia episodes and (3) patient reported outcome measures. RESULTS: Enrollment was initiated in January 2020. Through April 2023 119 patients have been recruited. Results are expected to be disseminated in 2024. CONCLUSION: This study compares PV isolation using cryoablation to a sham procedure. The study will estimate the effect of PV isolation on AF burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dulai et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (n=140). Pulmonary vein isolation (cryoballoon ablation) vs. Sham procedure (phrenic nerve pacing) was evaluated on Total AF burden at 6 months postrandomisation (excluding the 3 month blanking period). The SHAM-PVI study is an ongoing double-blind randomized trial of 140 patients designed to compare pulmonary vein isolation to a sham procedure for reducing total atrial fibrillation burden at 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Atrial fibrillationMore from Clinical Cardiology