Key result
MPI derived EF underestimated radionuclide EF by 0.03 and showed no significant relationship in regression analysis, with only moderate agreement between methods.
Why the study?
Does Doppler-derived myocardial performance index accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction compared to radionuclide angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=61)
Does Doppler-derived myocardial performance index accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction compared to radionuclide angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Calculating ejection fraction from the myocardial performance index using a previously published formula is not statistically reliable compared to radionuclide angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MPI-derived EF unreliable for LVEF in acute MI; leaves open validation of noninvasive alternatives in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to validate a previously published method to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from the myocardial performance index (MPI or Tei-index) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Sixty-one patients in sinus rhythm without overt heart failure were examined between 2 and 7 days after the acute MI. Doppler tracings from mitral inflow and left ventricular outflow were recorded together with two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) recordings. MPI was calculated from the Doppler tracings, and EF measured with the biplane Simpson's method. From MPI the EF was calculated by the formula EF = 0.60 - (0.34 x MPI). Radionuclide angiographic (RNA) measurements of EF were performed within 1 day of the Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Compared with radionuclide EF, MPI derived EF significantly underestimated EF by 0.03 (+/-0.013; P = 0.027), whereas there was no significant difference in mean EF between 2DE and RNA. There was no statistically significant difference in the agreement between MPI derived EF relative to RNA, or 2DE relative to RNA. The agreement between the three methods was only moderate with wide limits of agreement (+/-0.17). The relationship expressed by the proposed formula for calculating EF from MPI was not statistically significant in regression analysis in this patient population. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant relationship was found between MPI and EF by radionuclide angiography. However, MPI derived EF was as accurate as biplane echocardiographic measurements of EF when compared with radionuclide EF, but the agreement between methods was only moderate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hole et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=61). MPI derived EF vs. Radionuclide angiographic (RNA) EF was evaluated on Agreement between MPI derived EF and radionuclide EF (p=0.027). MPI derived EF underestimated radionuclide EF by 0.03 and showed no significant relationship in regression analysis, with only moderate agreement between methods.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: