Key result
AI-optimized polygenic risk scores enhance CVD prediction over non-optimized models by integrating diverse variables.
Why the study?
Traditional cardiovascular risk prediction models often fail to identify high-risk individuals before adverse events occur, while polygenic risk scores face challenges in clinical practice.
Do AI-optimized polygenic risk scores improve cardiovascular disease prediction compared to conventional PRS models?
Systematic Review
Do AI-optimized polygenic risk scores improve cardiovascular disease prediction compared to conventional PRS models?
AI-optimized polygenic risk scores significantly improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction by integrating genetic data with clinical risk factors, biomarkers, and imaging.
May refine CVD risk stratification now; extends Level 1 evidence for AI-optimized PRS integration.
Despite advances in cardiovascular disease risk stratification, traditional risk prediction models often fail to identify high-risk individuals before adverse events occur, underscoring the need for more precise tools. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) quantify genetic susceptibility by aggregating genetic variants but face challenges in practice. This systematic review investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms can optimize PRS (AI-optimized PRS) to improve cardiovascular disease prediction. Analyzing 13 studies, we found that AI-optimized PRS models enhance predictive accuracy by improving feature selection, handling high-dimensional data, and integrating diverse variables-including clinical risk factors, biomarkers, imaging, and combining multiple PRS. These models outperform nonoptimized PRS models, providing a more comprehensive understanding of individual risk profiles. Evidence suggests that AI-optimized PRS can better stratify patients and guide personalized prevention strategies. Future research is needed to explore sex differences, include diverse populations, integrate AI-optimized PRS into electronic health records, and assess cost-effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosseini et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease. AI-optimized Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) vs. Conventional PRS models or established clinical risk scores was evaluated on Predictive accuracy (AUC/C-index) for cardiovascular disease. AI-optimized polygenic risk scores enhance predictive accuracy for cardiovascular disease outcomes by integrating diverse variables compared to non-optimized models.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: