Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary The interactive effects of atmospheric CO 2 concentration and soil‐water content on grain sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor ) are reported here. Sorghum plants were exposed to ambient (control) and free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE; ambient + 200 µmol mol −1 ), under ample (wet, 100% replacement of evapotranspiration) and reduced (dry, postplanting and mid‐season irrigations) water supply over two growing seasons. FACE reduced seasonal average stomatal conductance ( g s ) by 0.17 mol (H 2 O) m −2 s −1 (32% and 37% for dry and wet, respectively) compared with control; this was similar to the difference between dry and wet treatments. FACE increased net assimilation rate ( A ) by 4.77 µmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 (23% and 9% for dry and wet, respectively), whereas dry decreased A by 10.50 µmol (CO 2 ) m −2 s −1 (26%) compared with wet. Total plant water potential (ψ w ) was 0.16 MPa (9%) and 0.04 MPa (3%) less negative in FACE than in the control treatment for dry and wet, respectively. Under dry, FACE stimulated final shoot biomass by 15%. By ameliorating the adverse effects of drought, elevated atmospheric CO 2 improved plant water status, which indirectly caused an increase in carbon gain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wall et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: