Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A biphasic dose-response curve was observed when the IL-1-dependent HTL clone D10 was exposed to IL-1 plus supernatants from some activated T cell clones but not others. The active component that inhibited proliferation at high concentrations of these supernatants appeared to be IFN-gamma based on the following findings: 1) the biphasic pattern of responsiveness correlated with the presence of IFN-gamma in the supernatants; 2) an anti-IFN-gamma mAb augmented the proliferation of D10 cells to these supernatants; 3) rIFN-gamma inhibited profoundly the response of D10 cells stimulated with rIL-1 plus supernatant from activated D10 cells or with rIL-1 plus rIL-4; 4) the response of D10 cells to rIL-1 plus rIL-2 also was inhibited by rIFN-gamma, although to a lesser extent. The proliferation of an additional Th2 clone stimulated with rIL-1 plus rIL-4 or rIL-2 also was inhibited by rIFN-gamma, implicating IFN-gamma as an inhibitory lymphokine for Th2 cells in general. rIFN-gamma did not affect the proliferation of two Th1 clones, nor did it affect the proliferation of an unconventional HTL clone which produces both IL-4 and IFN-gamma and proliferates in response to IL-2 or IL-4 in an IL-1-independent fashion. The proliferation of D10 cells stimulated by Ag or by immobilized anti-CD3 antibody also was blocked by rIFN-gamma, whereas IL-4 production in response to these stimuli was unaffected, indicating that proliferation and not general cell function was specifically inhibited. Collectively, these data implicate IFN-gamma as a suppressive factor for the proliferation of the subset of HTL designated Th2, and suggest that the relative amounts of the various lymphokines present during an immune response may direct which T cell types increase in number.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gajewski et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: