Key result
Emergency surgery linked to ~150% higher surgical site infection rates versus elective procedures.
Why the study?
Surgical site infections cause extended hospital stays, readmissions, and higher morbidity, requiring surveillance to explore infection burden and risk factors to revise infection control policies in a Malaysian surgical population.
What is the burden of surgical site infections and associated risk factors in a Malaysian surgical population?
Cohort (n=216)
No
What is the burden of surgical site infections and associated risk factors in a Malaysian surgical population?
Effect estimate: OR 2.5
Absolute Event Rate: 20.3% vs 9.2%
p-value: p=0.02
Emergency procedures and the presence of comorbidities significantly increase the risk of surgical site infections, highlighting the importance of risk stratification tools like MUST and NNIS.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common healthcare-associated infections that occur among surgical patients. Surgical site infections result in longer hospital stays, hospital readmissions, and higher death and morbidity rates. The current study was designed to highlight the importance of such surveillance studies in a Malaysian surgical population with a motive to evaluate and revise concurrent infection control and prevention policies by exploring the burden of surgical site infection and identifying its associated risk factors for future considerations. In this prospective observational cohort study, a total of 216 patients admitted to a surgical ward were identified and studied. Of these 216 patients, 142 elective procedures and 74 emergency procedures were included in the study, of which 13 patients (9.2%) undergoing elective procedures and 15 (20.3%) patients undergoing emergency procedures were SSI positive (OR: 2.5, p = 0.02). Among surgical site infections, 21 were superficial and 7 were deep incisional SSI. No case of organ/space SSI was identified. The time taken for SSIs to develop ranged from 2–17 days with a median of 6 days. Risk factors such as presence of comorbidities (p = 0.011), major co-existing medical diagnosis ≥2 (p = 0.02), and pre-existing infection (p = 0.027) were statistically significant. SSI-positive patients experienced an increase in the post-operative length of hospital stay. In the current population, it was seen that identifying patients who were at high risk of malnutrition via MUST and the NNIS risk index will help clinicians in identifying high risk patients and in managing their patients appropriately. Identifying patients who were at high risk of malnutrition will also improve postoperative outcomes considerably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Surgical site infection (n=216). Emergency procedures vs. Elective procedures was evaluated on Surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 2.5, p=0.02). Emergency surgical procedures were associated with a significantly higher rate of surgical site infections compared to elective procedures (20.3% vs 9.2%; OR 2.5, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: