Key result
Fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy provides a viable alternative for STEMI when primary PCI is delayed.
Why the study?
Does a fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy provide a viable alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction when timely PCI is delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic?
Does a fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy provide a viable alternative to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction when timely PCI is delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy may need to be considered for STEMI patients when timely primary PCI cannot be delivered due to systemic challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic.
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in additional challenges for systems designed to perform expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. There are 2 important considerations: the guideline-recommended time goals were difficult to achieve for many patients in high-income countries even before the pandemic, and there is a steep increase in mortality when primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be delivered in a timely fashion. Although the use of fibrinolytic therapy has progressively decreased over the last several decades in high-income countries, in circumstances when delays in timely delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention are expected, a modern fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy may need to be considered. The purpose of this review is to systematically discuss the contemporary role of an evidence-based fibrinolytic reperfusion strategy as part of a pharmacoinvasive approach, in the context of the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez et al. (2020) conducted a review in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy vs. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated. A modern fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy should be considered for STEMI patients when timely primary percutaneous coronary intervention is delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: