Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Relationships are unique mini-cultures in which the parties construct meaning systems in a variety of ways, including ritual enactments, stories and symbols. This study examines the content features and functions of the symbols by which relationship parties identify their relationships. A group of 108 randomly selected respondents from a university population was interviewed with regard to the relationship symbols for either a romantic relationship or a friendship relationship. Results indicated a total of 499 symbols which were distributed among five basic forms: behavioural actions, prior events/times, physical objects, special places and cultural artefacts. These types differed in their perceived importance, with Places and Events/Times perceived as the most important. Respondents attributed nine substantive functions to their relationship symbols, the most frequent of which were prompting recollection, indicating intimacy, promoting communion, providing stimulation/fun and affording seclusion from others. Romantic and friendship relationships did not differ in the quantity, valence, importance or functional richness of their respective relationship symbols; however, romantic relationships were more likely to have physical object symbols, whereas friendships were more likely to have behavioural action and event/time symbols. Relationship closeness was positively correlated with symbol valence, importance and functional richness. Females reported their relationship symbols to be more positive, more multi-functional and somewhat more important than the relationship symbols that males reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leslie A. Baxter (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: