Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a recent paper in Mind 1 Prof. Arthur W. Burks has made an interesting proposal for the construction of a logic of causal propositions. Such a logic is greatly needed, for however completely the word ‘cause’ has been eliminated from epistemology, it is still very much a part of the working vocabulary of most empirical scientists. Prof. Burks begins, wisely, by avoiding the Humean controversy, and asks instead whether it is possible to give a clear and consistent explication within a system of logic of the term ‘cause’ as it is used in common speech. While I am wholly in accord with Prof. Burks’ suggestion that such an explication is possible and useful, my own investigations into the question have led me to a definitional proposal that is somewhat different from his.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herbert A. Simon (1952) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: