Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Engineers/scientists (n = 76) either participated in the setting of, or were assigned, specific behavioral goals during their performance appraisal. Participative goal setting resulted in more difficult goals -being set than was the case when the goals were assigned. Perceptions of goal difficulty, however, were not significantly different in the two goal-setting conditions. The analysis of the performance data collected 6 months later (n— 132) revealed main effects for both goal setting and anticipated rewards. Only participative goal setting led to significantly higher performance than a do your best and a control group condition. There was no significant difference between the performance of the latter two conditions despite the fact that the individuals in the do-your-best group received knowledge of results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latham et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: