The presented study aims to describe the seismic vulnerability of a sample made by 90 masonry one-nave churches, subjected to the Valle Scrivia Earthquake, 2003, Piemonte, Italy. In particular, the paper reports analyses performed looking at two different moments: (a) situation after the seismic event, identified through the data collection of the post-earthquake surveys; and (b) situation after 17 years, defined after new in-situ surveys on a subset made by 20 masonry churches. For the first part, damage and vulnerability analyses have been performed on a statistical basis, by employing macroseismic intensity and peak ground acceleration as intensity measures. For the second part, a comparison between the vulnerability states in the two periods investigated has been proposed, by focusing on the effects of detected interventions on site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruggieri et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: