Key result
Apixaban proves cost-effective versus other anticoagulants in NVAF at under ~€7,500 per QALY gained.
Why the study?
The cost-effectiveness of apixaban for stroke prevention in adult NVAF patients compared with other DOACs and acenocoumarol based on Spanish real-world clinical practice data was not established.
Is apixaban cost-effective compared to other DOACs and acenocoumarol for stroke prevention in adult patients with NVAF?
Is apixaban cost-effective compared to other DOACs and acenocoumarol for stroke prevention in adult patients with NVAF?
Apixaban is a highly cost-effective treatment option compared to other DOACs and acenocoumarol for stroke prevention in patients with NVAF in Spain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Apixaban may inform Spanish NVAF formulary choices; leaves open generalizability beyond modeled assumptions.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of apixaban in the prevention of stroke in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), compared to other direct-acting oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) and the vitamin K antagonist acenocoumarol, based on data on effectiveness in clinical practice in Spain obtained in the FANTASIIA study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A probabilistic Markov economic model (second-order Monte Carlo simulation) was performed to analyze the costs and utilities (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) associated with the compared treatments, according to the different probabilities of stroke, major bleeding and death observed in FANTASIIA. RESULTS: The cost per QALY gained in the patient treated with apixaban versus comparators ranged from €2,919 to €7,462. The probability of apixaban being cost-effective ranges from 91.1% (vs dabigatran 150 mg), 97.8% (vs dabigatran 110 mg), and 100% (vs. rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the FANTASIIA study, apixaban is a cost-effective treatment (below a willingness to pay of €25,000 per QALY gained) compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol in treating patients with NVAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anguita et al. (2025) studied Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Apixaban vs. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol was evaluated on Cost per QALY gained. Apixaban was cost-effective compared to dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and acenocoumarol in NVAF, with the cost per QALY gained ranging from €2,919 to €7,462.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: