Why the study?
Healthcare resources usage and costs associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation were analyzed in Spain.
Does apixaban reduce healthcare resource usage and costs compared to acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does apixaban reduce healthcare resource usage and costs compared to acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Apixaban is associated with lower healthcare resource utilization and annual cost savings compared to acenocoumarol in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Apixaban-associated lower event rates in NVAF warrant caution; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Aim: Healthcare resources usage and costs associated to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were analyzed in Spain. Methods: This is an observational and retrospective study on patients with NVAF who started their treatment with apixaban or acenocoumarol between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017. Results: 2160 patients treated with apixaban were paired (1:1) with patients treated with acenocoumarol (propensity score matching). Apixaban reduced the incidence of strokes and systemic embolisms, minor and major bleedings and deaths, versus acenocoumarol. Apixaban led to reductions of 80, 55 and 43% in costs related to nursing visits, hospitalizations, and emergency visits, respectively, leading to annual cost savings of €274/patient, from the perspective of society. Conclusion: Our results suggested that apixaban is a cost-effective alternative for patients with NVAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Comín‐Colet et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: