This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We investigate the small-sample quality of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE) of the parameters of a zero-inflated Poisson distribution (ZIP). The finite-sample bias of the MLE is determined to O(n−1) using an analytic bias-reduction methodology based on the work of Cox and Snell (1968 Cox, D.R., Snell, E.J. (1968). A general definition of residuals. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B 30:248–275. [Google Scholar]) and Cordeiro and Klein (1994 Cordeiro, G.M., Klein, R. (1994). Bias correction in ARMA models. Stat. Prob. Lett. 19:169–176.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Monte Carlo simulations show that the MLEs have very small percentage biases for this distribution, but the analytic bias-reduction methods essentially eliminate the bias without adversely affecting the mean-squared errors of the estimators. The analytic adjustment compares favorably with the parametric bootstrap bias-corrected estimator, in terms of bias reduction itself, as well as with respect to mean-squared error and Pitman’s nearness measure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwartz et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: