Defining electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate non‐type 1 Brugada ECG variants from normal incomplete RBBB patterns in the young SCD‐SOS cohort

INTRODUCTION: We assessed the prevalence of non-type 1 Brugada pattern (T1BrP) in children and young adults from the Sudden Cardiac Death-Screening Of risk factorS cohort and the diagnostic yield of nonexpert manual and automatic algorithm electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. We reviewed 14 662 ECGs and identified 2226 with a rSr'-pattern in V1-V2. Among these, 115 were classified by experts in hereditary arrhythmic-syndromes as having or not non-T1BrP, and were compared with measurements of 5 ECG-derived parameters based on a triangle formed by r' -wave (d(A), d(B), d(B)/h, β-angle) and ST-ascent, assessed both automatically and manually by nonexperts. We estimated intra- and interobserver concordance for each criterion, calculated diagnostic accuracy and defined the most appropriate cut-off values. RESULTS: A rSr'-pattern in V1-V2 was associated with higher PQ interval and QRS duration, male gender, and lower body mass index (BMI). The manual measurements of non-T1BrP criteria were moderately reproducible with high intraobserver and moderate interobserver concordance coefficients (ICC: 0.72-0.98, and 0.63-0.76). Criteria with higher discriminatory capacity were: distance d(B) (0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.80) and ST-ascent (0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92), which was superior to the 4 r'-wave criteria together (area under curve [AUC: 0.74]). We suggest new cut-offs with improved combination of sensitivity and specificity: d(B) ≥ 1.4 mm and ST-ascent ≥ 0.7 mm (sensitivity: 1%-82%; specificity: 71%-84%), that can be automatically measured to allow classification in four morphologies with increasing non-T1BrP probability. CONCLUSION: rSr'-pattern in precordial leads V1-V2 is a frequent finding and the detection of non-T1BrP by using the aforementioned five measurements is reproducible and accurate. In this study, we describe new cut-off values that may help untrained clinicians to identify young individuals who may require further work-up for a potential Brugada Syndrome diagnosis.