Aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic-Hall valve demonstrated a 25-year survival rate of 24.9%, with low linearized rates of thromboembolic complications (1.5%/patient-year).
Cohort (n=816)
No
What are the long-term survival and complication rates of the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis in the aortic position?
The Medtronic-Hall mechanical aortic valve demonstrates excellent 25-year durability with no mechanical failures and low rates of valve-related complications.
BACKGROUND: The Medtronic-Hall valve was developed and for the first time implanted in Oslo, Norway, in 1977. A total of 1104 patients received this valve at Rikshospitalet from 1977 to 1987. In the present study, we followed up on all 816 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement over a 25-year period. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 816 consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic-Hall valve at Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway, from 1977 to 1987. All patients were contacted by means of questionnaires or telephone. Data were checked against hospital databases and medical records. Date of death was verified by the Norwegian civil registry. Follow-up was 99.6% complete. Survival analysis included operative deaths as well as late deaths. Survival at 25 years was 24.9%. No mechanical failures were found. Valve thrombosis was seen in 4 patients, in 1 case combined with pannus formation. Small valves (20 mm to 21 mm) were associated with reduced survival; however, when controlled for the confounding effects of age and gender, valve size did not remain a significant risk factor. Patient-related factors were important: Older age, female gender, and the need for concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery significantly reduced survival, whereas surgery of the ascending aorta did not. Linearized rates of thromboembolic complications, warfarin-related bleeding, and endocarditis were 1.5%, 0.7%, and 0.16%/patient-year, respectively. At follow-up, 79% of the patients were in New York Heart Association classes I to II. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the excellent long-term outcome for patients with Medtronic-Hall valves in the aortic position.
Svennevig et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve replacement (n=816). Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis was evaluated on Survival at 25 years. Aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic-Hall valve demonstrated a 25-year survival rate of 24.9%, with low linearized rates of thromboembolic complications (1.5%/patient-year).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: