Key result
Increasing the number of vessels with coronary artery calcium was associated with an incrementally higher risk of all-cause mortality (4-vessel HR 2.22) after adjusting for the Agatston score.
Why the study?
Does the regional distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) improve the prediction of all-cause mortality compared to the traditional Agatston CAC score in asymptomatic individuals?
Population
23,058 asymptomatic individuals referred for electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of…
Comparison
Assessment of regional distribution of coronary… vs Single-vessel CAC, concentrated CAC, or…
Design
Cohort, Ascertainment of mortality was verified by individuals blinded to…
Follow-up
mean 5.6 to 6.6 years
Authors
Loading...
May enhance CAC-based risk stratification in asymptomatic patients; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Cohort (n=23,058)
Yes
Does the regional distribution of coronary artery calcium (CAC) improve the prediction of all-cause mortality compared to the traditional Agatston CAC score in asymptomatic individuals?
Effect estimate: HR 2.22
The regional distribution of coronary artery calcium, including the number of vessels involved and left main disease, significantly improves the prediction of all-cause mortality beyond the traditional Agatston score.
Tota-Maharaj et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=23,058). Multi-vessel coronary artery calcium (CAC) vs. Single-vessel CAC was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.22). Increasing the number of vessels with coronary artery calcium was associated with an incrementally higher risk of all-cause mortality (4-vessel HR 2.22) after adjusting for the Agatston score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: