Key result
Transitional care interventions for hospitalized younger adults lack cultural tailoring and racial subgroup analyses.
Why the study?
Few transitional care interventions evaluate patient quality of life as a primary outcome, and existing interventions often overlook age-related needs, diverse races and ethnicities, and family involvement.
Do hospital to home care transitions improve quality of life in younger adult patients hospitalized with acute conditions?
Systematic Review (n=3,122)
Do hospital to home care transitions improve quality of life in younger adult patients hospitalized with acute conditions?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transitional care interventions for younger adults hospitalized with acute conditions are multi-component and currently lack cultural tailoring or racial/ethnic subgroup analyses.
BACKGROUND: Although transitional care interventions can improve health among patients hospitalized with acute conditions, few interventions use patient quality of life (QOL) as the primary outcome. Existing interventions use a variety of intervention components, are not effective for patients of all races and ethnicities, do not address age-related patient needs, and do not incorporate the needs of families. The purpose of this study was to systematically review characteristics of transitional care intervention studies that aimed to improve QOL for younger adult patients of all race and ethnicities who were hospitalized with acute conditions. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted of empirical literature available in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO by November 19, 2019 to identify studies of hospital to home care transitions with QOL as the primary outcome. Data extraction on study design and intervention components was limited to studies of patients aged 18-64. RESULTS: Nineteen articles comprising 17 studies met inclusion criteria. There were a total of 3,122 patients across all studies (range: 28-536). Populations of focus included cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, breast cancer, and kidney disease. Seven QOL instruments were identified. All interventions were multi-component with a total of 31 different strategies used. Most interventions were facilitated by a registered nurse. Seven studies discussed intervention facilitator training and eight discussed intervention materials utilized. No studies specified cultural tailoring of interventions or analyzed findings by racial/ethnic subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to determine which intervention components, either in isolation or in combination, are effective in improving QOL. Future studies should also elaborate on the background and training of intervention facilitators and on materials utilized and may also consider incorporating differences in culture, race and ethnicity into all phases of the research process in an effort to address and reduce any health disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oyesanya et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Acute conditions (n=3,122). Transitional care interventions vs. Usual care was evaluated on Quality of life. Transitional care interventions for younger adults hospitalized with acute conditions utilized 31 different strategies and 7 quality of life instruments, but none specified cultural tailoring or analyzed findings by racial/ethnic subgroup.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: