Key result
Continuous monitoring with an implantable device revealed significant temporal variability in AF burden, with 40.0% of initial no/low AF patients progressing to high AF over 2 years.
Why the study?
Does atrial fibrillation burden change over time when detected by continuous monitoring in patients with a dual-chamber CRMD and stroke risk factors?
Observational
Does atrial fibrillation burden change over time when detected by continuous monitoring in patients with a dual-chamber CRMD and stroke risk factors?
Continuous monitoring reveals significant temporal variability in atrial fibrillation burden, with frequent transitions between low and high burden states over 2 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AF burden may require serial reassessment in CRMD patients; leaves open whether dynamic monitoring improves risk stratification.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden and duration are predictors of thromboembolic events. The random nature of these measures may affect clinical decision making. The objective of this study was to determine temporal changes in AF burden as detected by continuous monitoring. HYPOTHESIS: AF burden changes over time when detected by continuous monitoring. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the TRENDS (A Prospective Study of the Clinical Significance of Atrial Arrhythmias Detected by Implanted Device Diagnostics) study with ≥1 stroke risk factor(s) who were implanted with a dual-chamber cardiac rhythm management device (CRMD) and had AF burden data available for ≥2 years was performed. AF burden was defined as no AF, low AF (<5.5 hours on any given day), or high AF burden (≥5.5 hours in a day), and was first assessed over the initial 30 days following enrollment and then reassessed at 6-month intervals for 2 years. RESULTS: VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or TIA, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) score was 3.7 ± 1.6. In the 30-day baseline period, 75.1% of patients had no AF, 11.2% had low AF, and 13.7% had high AF. Over the subsequent 2 years, 40.0% of patients initially classified as no AF or low AF experienced periods with high AF, whereas 59.3% of patients initially classified as high AF experienced ≥6 consecutive months with no AF or low AF. Advanced age was the sole predictor of AF progression. CONCLUSIONS: Significant temporal variability in AF burden exists when measured continuously with an implantable CRMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaplan et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation. Continuous monitoring with an implantable cardiac rhythm management device was evaluated on Temporal changes in AF burden. Continuous monitoring with an implantable device revealed significant temporal variability in AF burden, with 40.0% of initial no/low AF patients progressing to high AF over 2 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: