Key result
Unfavorable social determinants of health linked to ~2.4-fold higher cardiovascular morbidity, partially mediated by cardiovascular health.
Why the study?
The role of Life's Essential 8 metrics in addressing cardiovascular disease disparities associated with social determinants of health remains unclear.
Does exposure to unfavorable social determinants of health increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and to what extent do Life's Essential 8 metrics mediate these associations in US adults?
Cohort (n=29,306)
Does exposure to unfavorable social determinants of health increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and to what extent do Life's Essential 8 metrics mediate these associations in US adults?
Odds Ratio: 2.36 (95% CI 2.18–2.55)
p-value: p=<0.01
Unfavorable social determinants of health are strongly associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and public health interventions improving Life's Essential 8 metrics could significantly mediate and reduce this risk.
Unfavorable SDoH exposure was associated with higher CVD morbidity; supports LE8 as partial mediator but leaves open causal confirmation in trials.
Background: Life's Essential 8 (LE8) provides a framework to assess and improve cardiovascular health, ultimately reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, the role of LE8 metrics in addressing CVD disparities associated with social determinants of health (SDoH) remains unclear. Methods: This cohort study employed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2018) data. Logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazard models, and multiple mediation analysis were used to assess the associations of the SDoH score with CVD morbidity (self-reported diagnosis of congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, and stroke), CVD mortality, and mortality (mortality data were derived from the NHANES Public-Use Linked Mortality File), as well as the contributions of LE8 metrics to the associations. Results: The top four reported unfavorable SDoH were low education level (21.5%), income-to-poverty ratio <3 (17.5%), no private health insurance (13.0%), and unemployment (11.5%). Unfavorable SDoH exposure was associated with higher CVD morbidity [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.36 (2.18, 2.55) and CVD mortality [hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI: 2.70 (2.24, 3.24)]. LE8 metrics accounted for approximately 30.4% (95%CI: 26.2%, 34.7%), 23.0% (95%CI: 19.3%, 28.3%), and 24.0% (95%CI: 20.6%, 28.8%) of the association between SDoH and CVD morbidity, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality, respectively, with nicotine exposure, physical activity, and sleep health being the main LE8 contributors. Differences in the distribution of SDoH components, as well as the contribution of LE8 to the association between SDoH and CVD risk were observed across race/ethnicity groups. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the effectiveness for public health interventions targeting SDoH to improve LE8 metrics and ultimately reducing CVD morbidity and mortality. Future research should also explore the impact of non-LE8 factors and racial/ethnic differences in developing comprehensive CVD prevention strategies among U.S. adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (n=29,306). Unfavorable social determinants of health (SDoH) vs. Favorable social determinants of health was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease morbidity (OR 2.36, 95% CI 2.18-2.55, p=<0.01). Unfavorable social determinants of health exposure was significantly associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity (OR 2.36), with Life's Essential 8 metrics accounting for 30.4% of this association.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: