Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper shows that the analysis of Liu et al. (2004) contains a substantive error—the asserted pure-strategy Nash equilibrium leading to their Theorems 1 and 2 is really not an equilibrium. We show that in their model, either pure-strategy Nash equilibria do not exist or, unlike their asserted main result, when a pure-strategy equilibrium exists, increasing the number of commercial television broadcasters does not result in lower-quality programs. Possible modifications of Liu et al.’s model that may help restore the desired result are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chou et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: