Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A topology-free parameterisation is used to optimise geometries in supersonic flow under a volume constraint, using a gradient-based method. In two-dimensions, these geometries recover parabolic shapes for a small volume constraint, and shapes with a similar forebody but truncated afterbody when the volume constraint is increased. All cases presented provide a reduction in Cd compared to the two-dimensional parabolic optimal geometries of equivalent area. In three dimensions, small volume constraints lead to a Sears-Haack like shape, but when the volume is increased, the Sears-Haack body becomes truncated and terminates in a crenellated boat-tail. This type of afterbody is unusual and only possible due to the flexibility of the volume-of-solid parameterisation used. This appears to provide an advantage in terms of drag from Euler computations, although it is not known if such an advantage would be seen in a real flow. Neither case presented in three dimensions improves over the Sears-Haack geometry of equivalent volume, however this appears to be due to an excessively coarse parameterisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (2024) studied this question.