Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 1981Marine Ecology Progress SeriesOpen Access

Influence of Method on the Apparent Size Distribution of Bacterioplankton Cells: Epifluorescence Microscopy Compared to Scanning Electron Microscopy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Jed A. FuhrmanJed A. FuhrmanUniversity of Southern California

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Jed A. Fuhrman (1981) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1218b4f7bd4f5c7da5cd8ahttps://doi.org/10.3354/meps005103
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Contribution of bacteria to standing crop of coastal plankton11976 · 278 citations
  2. 2Frequency of Dividing Cells, a New Approach to the Determination of Bacterial Growth Rates in Aquatic Environments1979 · 442 citations
  3. 3Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria1977 · 102 citations
  4. 4Bacterioplankton Secondary Production Estimates for Coastal Waters of British Columbia, Antarctica, and California1980 · 881 citations
  5. 5Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy1977 · 4,288 citations