Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A well-motivated method for demonstrating that an experiment resists any classical explanation is to show that its statistics violate generalized noncontextuality. We here formulate this problem as a linear program and provide an open-source implementation of it which tests whether or not any given prepare-measure experiment is classically explainable in this sense. The input to the program is simply an arbitrary set of quantum states and an arbitrary set of quantum effects; the program then determines if the Born rule statistics generated by all pairs of these can be explained by a classical (noncontextual) model. If a classical model exists, it provides an explicit model. If it does not, then it computes the minimal amount of noise that must be added such that a model does exist, and then provides this model. We generalize all these results to arbitrary generalized probabilistic theories (and accessible fragments thereof) as well; indeed, our linear program is a test of simplex embeddability as introduced in Schmid et al. PRX Quantum 2, 010331 (2021).2691-339910.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010331 and generalized in Selby et al. Phys. Rev. A 107, 062203 (2023).PLRAAN2469-992610.1103/PhysRevA.107.062203.
Selby et al. (Tue,) studied this question.