Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The current paper examines how individual/personality factors are associated with the political legitimacy of government restrictions at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 1262 US-based participants completed an online survey comprising several scales (predictor factors), such as the Just World Scale, the Police Legitimacy Scale, and the Authoritarianism Scale measuring aggression, submission, and conventionalism. In addition, they completed scales measuring their Fear of COVID and Perceptions of Government (outcome factors). The results suggest that those who viewed the president or federal government as most responsible had lower legitimacy scores than those who reported their governor, state government, or local official or government to be responsible. Also, those who aligned with the Republican party had the lowest mean for fear of COVID, while the highest was in the “Other” political affiliation, followed by the Democrats, who had the second highest. It also turned out that whereas one’s relationships with those who have been hospitalized or died as a result of COVID and individual risk factors for COVID were not significant variables in predicting perceptions of the federal government’s handling of the pandemic, the most significant factors were Authoritarianism, Fear of COVID-19, (older) Age, Change in Federal Trust and Political Ideology. Fear of COVID-19 was the only significant factor predicting government legitimacy and individual decisions to engage in protection measures during the pandemic. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Palace et al. (Wed,) studied this question.