Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many anti-corruption initiatives face an inherent dilemma: the very actors which must adopt and implement policies to curb corruption are those which may face weak, or even negative, incentives to do so. Where corruption in authoritarian states is already endemic, a vicious form of this “orthodox paradox” emerges, as elites adopting anti-corruption measures attempt to police themselves. This paper presents an institutionalist approach to linking the context of anti-corruption reforms to their likely effectiveness and sustainability. It applies this approach to the assessment of Vietnam’s 2005 anti-corruption law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott A. Fritzen (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: