Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I argue that René Magritte visualises an aesthetic of the uncanny sublime by sustaining a tensive dynamic between the visible and the invisible, the known and the unknown. Because the revealing of the sublime is deferred, Magritte’s perspective derives more from a modernist post-religious context that is neither dependent on a metaphysical absolute, nor a secular renunciation of the sacred. This article therefore challenges the view that Magritte’s surrealist art belongs either to an anti-sublime tradition, one that dismantles any illusory solace to transcendent qualities, or a postmodern ideology that posits a fundamental split between representation and reality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Freer (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: