Meta-analysis reveals external visualizations significantly enhance mathematics learning across diverse learners, indicating both digital and analog tools reliably boost academic achievement.
Visualization has a long tradition in mathematics education and research on this topic has become more widespread in recent decades. In a meta-analysis (41 studies, N = 10,562), we aimed to synthesize the effects of learning with external visualizations on mathematics outcomes. We analyzed intervention, learner, and outcome characteristics as moderators. Overall, results of a random-effects model indicated a medium effect ( g = 0.504, 95% CI [0.379, 0.630]) of visualization interventions on mathematics learning, with significant heterogeneity. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes were higher in quasi-experimental studies and when compared with business-as-usual conditions. These results emphasize the effectiveness of external visualization as a powerful tool to support mathematics learning, with positive and lasting effects across age groups and mathematical topics. • In a meta-analysis, we synthesized 41 math visualization intervention studies. • Interventions had a medium overall effect on student learning in math. • Interventions had positive and lasting effects across mathematical topics. • Technology use was not superior to analog visualization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoenherr et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: