Using a variationist, i.e. accountable, approach to the study of code‐switching, this paper attempts to validate the equivalence contraint on intrasentential code‐switching on the basis of natural speech data from two typologically different languages, Finnish and English. Though the data include many apparent exceptions to the constraint, the authors show how these are resolved by distinguishing on the one hand between code‐switching and borrowing, and on the other between the different functions code‐switching fulfills in the discourse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poplack et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: