Key result
Emergency geriatric units linked to ~21% fewer 30-day readmissions and lower costs vs mobile teams.
Why the study?
Although emergency department-based emergency geriatric medicine units reduce hospitalizations and readmissions, their cost-effectiveness compared to mobile geriatric teams remains uncertain.
Does an emergency geriatric medicine unit improve cost-effectiveness and reduce 30-day emergency department readmissions compared to mobile geriatric teams in older patients?
Observational (n=338)
No
Does an emergency geriatric medicine unit improve cost-effectiveness and reduce 30-day emergency department readmissions compared to mobile geriatric teams in older patients?
Effect estimate: RR 0.79
Absolute Event Rate: 0.09% vs 0.13%
An emergency department-based geriatric medicine unit appears to be a more cost-effective model than mobile geriatric teams, reducing both 30-day readmissions and average costs for older patients.
May support ED geriatric units in older adults; leaves open whether RCTs confirm cost-effectiveness.
Older adults, with complex needs and an elevated risk of complications, account for a high proportion of emergency visits in France. Mobile geriatric teams (MGTs) and the emergency geriatric medicine unit (EGMU) based in the emergency department (ED) have been developed to improve care. Although the EGMU reduces hospitalizations and readmissions, its cost-effectiveness remains uncertain. This study assessed the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the EGMU compared to the MGT unit. In all, 338 older patients were included: 102 managed by the MGT unit in January 2014 and 236 in the EGMU in January 2015, which replaced the MGT unit. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of readmission to the ED within 30 days (30DRA). We conducted the analysis from the payer’s perspective, incorporated a Monte Carlo simulation, and generated a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The average cost per patient was estimated to be €5,738.16 in the EGMU, compared to €6,701.35 in the MGT unit. The mean 30DRA was 0.09 for the EGMU and 0.13 for the MGT unit. The ICER was €24,079 per readmission avoided (RA). The probability that the EGMU would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €33,622.84 per RA was 63.26%. The EGMU appears to be more efficient than the MGT unit, reducing 30DRA and average costs, although further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawadogo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Non-life-threatening emergencies in older adults (n=338). Emergency geriatric medicine unit (EGMU) vs. Mobile geriatric team (MGT) unit was evaluated on 30-day readmission rate to the emergency department (30DRA) (RR 0.79). The emergency geriatric medicine unit reduced 30-day readmissions by 21% (RR 0.79) and lowered average costs compared to the mobile geriatric team, with an ICER of €24,079 per readmission avoided.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: