Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Depression is frequently seen among pregnant women. The PHQ-9 is a diagnostic criteria-based screening instrument. Objective: The objective is to identify the factor structure of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and to confirm its measurement and structural invariance regarding parity and observation time, as well as to examine reliability by calculating omega indices in a population of pregnant Japanese women. Methods: The PHQ-9 was distributed to 382 pregnant women with a gestational age of 10 to 13 weeks who were attending antenatal clinics. Of these women, 129 were tested again with the PHQ-9 one week later. Results: Exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) of the PHQ-9 items were conducted using a halved sample. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) among the other halved sample compared the single-, two-factor models derived from the EFAs, literature model and bifactor model. The bifactor model was significantly better in terms of goodness-of-fit indices: χ2/df = 1.030 (18), CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.012. ECV suggested multidimensionality. Internal consistency was excellent: ω = 0.868, ω. Somatic factor = 0.756, ω. Non-somatic factor = 0.817. ωH = 0.795, ωHS. Somatic factor = 0.330, ωHS. Non-somatic factor = 0.032. The bifactor structure model showed configural, measurement, and structural invariances between primiparas and multiparas as well as at two observation occasions. Conclusion: The findings suggested that the PHQ-9 used among pregnant women was robust in its factor structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakamatsu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: