Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence mapping study reveals uneven focus on mitigation over adaptation across marine literature, highlighting critical ecosystem gaps and global equity imbalances.
The ocean has a vital role to play in addressing the global challenge of climate change, which requires both mitigation and adaptation actions. The exponential increase in research relating to ocean-related options (OROs) requires a rapid and reproducible method to assess the state of knowledge. We train a state-of-the-art large language model to characterise the landscape of ORO research by classifying 44,193 (±11,615) articles across various descriptors. Research proves to be unevenly distributed, concentrating on OROs with mitigation objectives (80%), while revealing research gaps including under-researched ecosystems and an observed paucity of studies simultaneously assessing different ORO types. We also uncover social inequalities driven by mismatches between the global distribution of research effort, climate change responsibility, and risk. These findings are important to maximise the efficacy of OROs, position them within broader climate action portfolios, and inform future research priorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veytia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: