Key result
Advanced cardiac CT and MRI identify arrhythmogenic substrates to potentially improve ablation outcomes and procedural time.
Why the study?
Increasing evidence supports advanced imaging with CCT and CMR in the work-up of patients with arrhythmias being considered for ablation.
Does advanced imaging with CCT and CMR improve the identification of arrhythmogenic substrates and procedural planning in patients undergoing ablation for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias?
Does advanced imaging with CCT and CMR improve the identification of arrhythmogenic substrates and procedural planning in patients undergoing ablation for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias?
Advanced imaging with CCT and CMR provides critical anatomical and substrate characterization that can optimize ablation strategies for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CCT/CMR for ablation planning; leaves open prospective validation of outcome gains.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Increasing evidence supports the use of advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the work-up of patients with arrythmias being considered for ablation. RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in imaging technology and postprocessing are facilitating the use of advanced imaging before, during and after ablation in patients with both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.In atrial arrythmias, quantitative assessment of left atrial wall thickness on CCT and quantification of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR identify patients more likely to develop recurrent atrial arrythmias following ablation. In addition, in patients with recurrent arrythmia post ablation, LGE CMR can potentially identify targets for repeat ablation.In ventricular arrythmias, qualitative assessment of LGE can aide in determining the optimal ablation approach and predicts likelihood of ventricular arrythmias inducibility. Quantitative assessment of LGE can identify conduction channels that can be targeted for ablation. On CCT, quantitative assessment of left ventricular wall thickness can demonstrate myocardial ridges associated with re-entrant circuits for ablation. SUMMARY: This review focuses on the utility of CCT and CMR in identifying key anatomical components and arrhythmogenic substrate contributing to both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients being considered for ablation. Advanced imaging has the potential to improve procedural outcomes, decrease complications and shorten procedural time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2022) conducted a review in Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias considered for ablation. Advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Advanced imaging with cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance identifies key anatomical components and arrhythmogenic substrates, potentially improving ablation outcomes and procedural time.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: