Key result
D-dimer and Doppler ultrasound screening detects DVT in ~10% of spinal cord injury rehabilitation patients.
Why the study?
Patients with spinal cord injury are at increased risk of deep vein thrombosis, but the usefulness of D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography for detection at various post-injury time points needed assessment.
Is D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography screening useful for detecting deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation?
Observational (n=145)
Is D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography screening useful for detecting deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury undergoing rehabilitation?
p-value: p=0.001
In patients with spinal cord injury, D-dimer measurement should be complemented by routine CDUS for detecting DVT within 6 months post-injury, whereas D-dimer screening alone is more useful after 6 months.
Supports DVT screening during SCI rehabilitation; leaves open optimal protocols pending prospective trials.
Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study aims at assessing usefulness of D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) for detecting DVT in patients undergoing rehabilitation at various time-points post-SCI. One-hundred forty-five patients were divided into three groups based on time elapsed since SCI: I (≥3 weeks to 3 months), II (≥3 to 6 months), and III (≥6 months). On admission, D-dimer plasma level measurement and CDUS of the lower limbs venous system were performed. DVT was diagnosed using CDUS in 15 patients (10.3% of entire group), more frequently in group I (22.2% of group) and II (11.7%) compared to group III (1.5%). Most DVT patients received thromboprophylaxis (80%) and were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (60%). Median D-dimer was elevated in patients with DVT from all groups, and also patients without DVT from groups I and II, but not group III. D-dimers were higher in patients with DVT than without DVT in the entire group (p = 0.001) and group I (p = 0.02), but not in groups II and III. The risk of DVT in SCI patients undergoing rehabilitation and thromboprophylaxis including asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases, is high within 6 months post-injury, and especially within 3 months. Measurement of D-dimer level should be complemented by routine CDUS for detecting DVT within 6 months post-SCI. Over 6 months, the usefulness of D-dimer screening alone is better for DVT detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mackiewicz−Milewska et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Spinal cord injury (n=145). D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) screening was evaluated on Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detection (p=0.001). Screening with D-dimer and compressive Doppler ultrasonography detected deep vein thrombosis in 10.3% of spinal cord injury patients undergoing rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: