Key result
Pharmacist-to-dose DOAC protocol linked to ~44% fewer medication errors vs pre-protocol phase.
Why the study?
DOACs carry high risk if mismanaged, with acute care error rates ranging from 25% to 40%, prompting evaluation of a pharmacist-to-dose DOAC protocol to reduce medication errors.
Does a pharmacist-driven DOAC protocol reduce medication errors in hospitalized patients receiving DOACs for VTE or AF?
Cohort (n=502)
No
Does a pharmacist-driven DOAC protocol reduce medication errors in hospitalized patients receiving DOACs for VTE or AF?
Implementation of a pharmacist-driven DOAC dosing protocol significantly reduced DOAC-related medication errors in hospitalized patients.
Pharmacist-driven DOAC dosing was associated with fewer medication errors; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm benefit before practice change.
Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are considered high‐risk medications and pose a serious threat to patients if mismanaged. Furthermore, medication error rates involving DOACs in the acute care setting range from 25% to 40%. To reduce medication error rates at our institution, we implemented a pharmacist‐driven DOAC protocol that permitted pharmacists to independently order and monitor DOACs pursuant to a consult order. Objective To determine the impact of a pharmacist‐to‐dose DOAC protocol on medication errors at an academic medical center. Methods This was a retrospective, single‐center cohort study using a pre‐post design to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist‐to‐dose DOAC protocol on rates of medication errors. Patient data were evaluated during a 6‐month period before and after the implementation of the protocol. Patients were excluded if they were receiving a DOAC for an indication other than venous thromboembolism and/or atrial fibrillation. Results A total of 502 patients (pre‐phase = 256; post‐phase = 246) admitted to the hospital and receiving a DOAC were included in the study. A total of 41 patients in the pre‐phase received a medication error involving a DOAC compared with 22 patients in the post‐phase (16% vs 8.9%; relative risk reduction 44%; P = .017). Rates of near misses were numerically higher in the post‐phase group (7.4% vs 11.8%; P = .1), and rates of discharge DOAC errors were numerically lower (8.5% vs 4.9%; P = .1). The most common error was underdosing (N = 31). Conclusion In this study, the implementation of a pharmacist‐to‐dose DOAC protocol was associated with a 44% reduction in DOAC‐related medication errors. These findings underscore the impact of a protocolized approach to DOAC management, as well as the role of pharmacists in overseeing inpatient DOAC use and reducing medication errors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Willeford et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism and/or atrial fibrillation (n=502). Pharmacist-to-dose DOAC protocol vs. Pre-protocol phase was evaluated on Medication errors involving a DOAC (RRR 44%, p=.017). Implementation of a pharmacist-to-dose DOAC protocol significantly reduced DOAC-related medication errors compared to the pre-protocol phase (8.9% vs 16%; relative risk reduction 44%; P=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: